Sunday, February 24, 2013

Hey, Santos, where ya been?

Hi Internet,

Sorry I've been neglecting you.  I'm not dead (at least not yet.)  I've just been busy teaching and purifying my physics chi through an archaic voodoo ritual otherwise known as applying for tenure track physics positions.  For those unfamiliar with the process, it's kind of like self-immolation except there's more begging and no warm toasty feeling.  The good news is after months of soul-crushing rejection, I just received an offer from a very good school.  I'll be at Simpson College in Iowa next year, and I'm very excited to be working with the extraordinarily talented and innovative faculty members there.

Soon to be my new digs.

In any event, I have a bit more free time, and I'm hoping to start posting new fun problems and (possibly) some fun physics videos.


Aaron Santos is a physicist and author of the books How Many Licks? Or How to Estimate Damn Near Anything and Ballparking: Practical Math for Impractical Sports Questions. Follow him on Twitter at @aarontsantos.

Thursday, October 4, 2012

My Bad...



OK...apparently I was wrong.  Someone needs to turn this into a Canadian version of Ocean's 11 pronto.  You can get the full article here.

Aaron Santos is a physicist and author of the books How Many Licks? Or How to Estimate Damn Near Anything and Ballparking: Practical Math for Impractical Sports Questions. Follow him on Twitter at @aarontsantos.

Sunday, September 9, 2012

Roller Coaster Winner!

We have a winner for the End of Summer Contest!  The question: how many people get stuck at the top of the Cedar Park roller coaster each year?

A stuck roller coaster is likely held in place by friction.  From the looks of it I would guess a 2 pound weight added to the front of a stuck roller coaster wouldn't do much to budge it, but a 200 pound man hanging off the front seems like more than enough to get it rolling again.  As such, I'll assume a 20 pound force is needed start a stopped roller coaster.  This force is equivalent to the frictional force holding it in place. 

There's a narrow range of heights near the peak at which the cars could stop and not accelerate because friction would be too strong.  It looks like the radius of curvature for the track is about 10 meters give or take.  The range of heights over which the carts would get stuck is only a small fraction of this.  I'll guess 5 centimeters since it's likely bigger than 5 millimeter and smaller than half a meter.



The initial velocity of the cart will correlate with how far it makes it up the hill.  Carts with speeds greater than some cutoff velocity will all make it over the hill.  Carts with speeds less than some other cutoff velocity will all roll back down the hill.  Carts with speeds between these two cutoffs will get stuck.  Using conservation of energy (perhaps a dubious move since we're relying on friction to stop us) we can relate the initial velocity to the height of the cart will climb up the hill:

m v2 / 2 = m g h

Here, m is the mass of the carts, g is the acceleration of gravity, and h is the height climbed.  The roller coaster might be 100 meters tall.  Carts stopping at heights anywhere between 99.95 meters and 100 meters will get stuck.  Using the energy equation, we can solve for the range of initial velocities for which this will happen.  Leaving out the messy math, you'll find that this occurs for velocities between 70.009 mph and 70.025 mph.

As you can see, there's a narrow range of velocities over which the roller coaster will get stuck.  What causes fluctuations in the initial velocity?  If we assume each ride gets pushed with the same impulse, then the only fluctuating variable would be the mass of the riders.  A roller coaster full of fatties is less likely to make to make it to the top.  I'll assume the average person weighs 170 pounds with a standard deviation of about 40 pounds.  If there are 50 riders, the standard deviation in weight would be about 3% of the mean total weight.  I'll assume the deviation in the initial velocity is the same as that of the weight, i.e. 3% of the mean.1

We still need to find the mean velocity.  For the sake of keeping their customers happy, I'm going to assume that roll backs happen only 5% percent of the time.  We can assume a normal distribution to find the mean for which this occurs.  Skipping the messy details once more, I get about 73.6 mph.

Using this mean and standard deviation, we can then find the fraction of times a cart will get stuck at the top of the hill.  Again assuming a normal distribution, I get about 0.1% of the time, which seems like a fairly reasonable estimate.

If the roller coaster operates 8 hours per day and each ride take 2 minutes, you'd have roughly 240 rides per day.  Over a 100 day season, you'd have 24,000 rides.  Roughly 24 of these would get stuck at the top.

Congratulations to our winners!

Aaron Santos is a physicist and author of the books How Many Licks? Or How to Estimate Damn Near Anything and Ballparking: Practical Math for Impractical Sports Questions. Follow him on Twitter at @aarontsantos.


[1] I'm assuming the carts are of negligible weight, which is probably stupid.  I suspect it won't throw the number off too much as long as it's comparable to the weight of people.




Sunday, September 2, 2012

A Sticky Situation



10 million pounds of maple syrup!  Am I the only one who thinks this number can't be right? If the thieves loaded up their truck with 3 tons on each trip, they would need to make 1700 trips!


On an unrelated note, contest winners will be chosen later this week.

Sunday, August 19, 2012

My New Job at Gustavus Adolphus



I'd been at my new Gustavus office only a couple hours when someone stopped by and tacked my nameplate up.  I could get used to this.  Good schools really know how to treat their faculty with respect.



Saturday, August 18, 2012

Give It a Rest, Fermi


I can't get away. I went to a "Night of Unbelieveable Fun" hosted by the Saint Paul Saints. Who do I find in the bathroom?  Enrico Fermi watching me pee:




A Question from Ninja Brian


Today's question comes from physicist Brian Wecht. Brian is co-founder of Story Collider, a podcast that shares people's personal stories about how science has affected their lives. Brian is also a member of Ninja Sex Party.1


Here's a picture of Brian in ninja form:

Brian's a very good ninja.

Brian asks,
What is the weight of all the facial hair grown by the world population of men on a given day? If you concentrated all that hair into one curly, villainous moustache, how long would that moustache be?
If I go a week without shaving, I'll have about half a centimeter of facial hair, which means my hair grows about 0.1 centimeters per day. Follicles are separated by about 1.0 millimeter, and they span an area of roughly 100 square inches.  Assuming each hair has a thickness of 0.1 millimeters and the same density of water at 1.0 grams per cubic centimeter, I would grow about 60 milligrams of facial hair each day.

For simplicity, I'll consider myself to be a typical man. This is not necessarilly a safe assumption however, since, follically speaking, I'm much more Wolverine than Bieber. Still, it should be a safe assumption for an order of magnitude estimate. If that's the case and we assume 20 percent of the world population (~1.4 billion people) are facial-hair growing men, then the total weight of facial hair grown on a given day would be about 90 tons.

This brings us to the second part of Brian's question: How long of a villainous mustache can we make?

Ninja Brian will save us from this dastardly villain.
Mustaches take up much less area than beards. If you glue all the beard hair grown in one day to the ends of the mustache hair grown in one day, it would be as if the mustache grew about four times faster than normal, which amounts to roughly 0.4 millimeters of growth each day. Spread out over the 1.4 billion facial-hair-growing men, that would give a villainous mustache that's about 350 miles long. Snidely Whiplash would be proud.

Thanks for a great question, Brian!

Aaron Santos is a physicist and author of the books How Many Licks? Or How to Estimate Damn Near Anything and Ballparking: Practical Math for Impractical Sports Questions. Follow him on Twitter at @aarontsantos.


[1] Somehow how I'm super happy that the blog has gone from a Nobel Laureate to a member of Ninja Sex Party.