"Meanwhile, Dr. Johnson’s cursory examination revealed the body was not quite cold; he concluded that death had occurred three to four hours earlier."
—E. J. Wagner's "A Murder in Salem" from the Nov. 2010 issue of Smithsonian
While stuck in Philadelphia International Airport after missing a connecting flight, I came across E. J. Wagner's "A Murder in Salem" in the Smithsonian magazine. I was struck by the simple physical analysis implicit in Dr. Johnson's examination of the murdered man's body. It seemed Sherlock Holmes-ian. How much would a dead body cool in four hours?
In principle, a dead body loses most of its heat through the skin.2 There is a well known physics equation describing the amount of heat flowing through a material from a hot temperature to a cold temperature. In symbols, this equation is written as
dQ / dt = (k · A / d) · ( Thot -Tcold )
Here, dQ is the heat energy that passes through the surface in some small amount of time dt. The variables k, A, d, Thot, and Tcold represent the thermal conductivity, the surface area of the material, the thickness of the material, and the temperatures of the hot side and cold side, respectively. Immediately before death, a healthy human body has a temperature of 37 °C (~98.6 °F). The average April temperature in Salem, MA is 8.7 °C (~47.6 °F), but room temperature is 25 °C (~72 °F).3 I'll assume the temperature difference between a healthy body and air in the room is about 12 °C. A large percentage of the energy our bodies use gets converted to heat. We consume about 2000 Calories per day or about 100 W, so we can estimate the heat energy as
dQ / dt = 100 W.
Dividing dQ/dt by the temperature difference, we can estimate the ratio of k·A/d
k · A / d = ( dQ / dt ) / ( Thot -Tcold )
= (100 W) / (12 °C)
= 8.3 W/°C
= (100 W) / (12 °C)
= 8.3 W/°C
The thermal conductivity equation is helpful, but we still need to know how much heat energy is stored in the dead man's body. An object's capacity for storing heat is called the "heat capacity". This heat capacity can be described by the equation
dQ = m · Cp · dT
where dQ is the heat energy lost when temperature decreases, m is the mass of the body that stores the heat, Cp is the heat capacity, and dT is the change in temperature. The heat capacity of a human body is about 3470 J/kg·°C and I'll assume the deceased man weighed 60 kg. Now you might think we could just solve these equations to obtain the time it takes for all the heat to flow out of the body, but there's one problem. Since the body's cooling, the temperature difference between the body and the air is always changing. To deal with rates of change, we generally use calculus. To do this, we combine the two equations and integrate to get
Tfinal = Tair + (Thealthy body - Tair) exp(- C t),
where,
C =k · A / [ m · Cp · d ]
= ( 8.3 W/°C) / [ (60 kg) · (3470 J/kg·°C) ]
= 0.00004 Hz.
Plugging in, we can plot the body temperature as a function of time:
We get a final body temperature of 32°C. This is still above room temperature but not yet cool, consistent with Dr. Johnson's observations.
[1] Given that Captain Smith had his head bashed in by a blunt custom-made club, I suspect the answer is yes.
[2] According to at least one reference, skin has a thermal conductivity of about 0.3 W/m·°C. I tried using this number directly and estimating human skin's area and thickness, but I kept getting screwy answers. Presumably, other tissues (fat, muscle, etc.) and clothing also effect the thermal conductivity which might explain this. As you'll see, there's a nice estimation trick you can do using the fact that we consume about 2000 Calories per day to get around this problem.
[3] They didn't have the best heating systems back then, so the air may have been colder. Fortunately, the qualitative results don't depend on the exact number.
[2] According to at least one reference, skin has a thermal conductivity of about 0.3 W/m·°C. I tried using this number directly and estimating human skin's area and thickness, but I kept getting screwy answers. Presumably, other tissues (fat, muscle, etc.) and clothing also effect the thermal conductivity which might explain this. As you'll see, there's a nice estimation trick you can do using the fact that we consume about 2000 Calories per day to get around this problem.
[3] They didn't have the best heating systems back then, so the air may have been colder. Fortunately, the qualitative results don't depend on the exact number.
That turned out to be a nice analysis! Some of those formulas I was not aware of before.
ReplyDelete